Wash?!
— nSigma @ 10:38 pm
Comments (0)
II. Trade Dress Dispute –the Logos (Lanham Act §43(a), 15 U.S.C. §1125(a))
Holding: The issue in this case is whether the round green base of the Starbucks logo is inherently distinctive and nonfunctional to be entitled protection under Lanham Act §43(a). If inherent distinctiveness is not present, then proof of secondary meaning is required.